AIBE PYQs for Environmental Law with Solutions: Practice AIBE Previous Year Questions

Updated 3+ months ago

Environmental Law is an important topic in the Legal Studies section in AIBE exam. Practising this topic will increase your score overall and make your conceptual grip on AIBE exam stronger.

This article gives you a full set of AIBE PYQs for Environmental Law with explanations for effective preparation. Practice of AIBE Legal Studies PYQs including Environmental Law questions regularly will improve accuracy, speed, and confidence in the AIBE 2025 exam.

AIBE PYQs for Environmental Law with Solutions

1.
Which of the following Acts is popularly known as Umbrella Legislation?
- The Factories Act, 1948
- The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
- The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974
- The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981
View Solution
2.
M.C. Mehta Vs Union of India 1986 Shriram food and Fertilisers case relates to:
- Oleium Gas leak
- Ganga water cleaning
- Child labour
- Bonded labour
View Solution
3.
Which of the following Acts is popularly known as Umbrella Legislation?
- The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974
- The Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981
- The Factories Act, 1948
- The Environment (Protection) Act, 1986
View Solution
4.
The case Krishna Gopal V/s State of MP relates to
- Water pollution
- Air and water pollution
- Noise and air pollution
- Water and noise pollution
View Solution
5.
Supreme Court in a PIL known as Kamal Nath case evolved,
- Basic Future and Basic structure doctrine
- Public Trust doctrine
- Separation of power doctrine
- Public Interest doctrine
View Solution
6.
The case Krishna Gopal V/s State of MP relates to
- Water pollution
- Air and water pollution
- Noise and air pollution
- Water and noise pollution
View Solution
7.
Which of the following is a landmark case on the public trust doctrine in Environmental Law?
- Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum v Union of India
- Olga Tellis v Bombay Municipal Corporation
- Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v Union of India
- M.C. Mehta v Kamal Nath
View Solution
8.
In which of the following case did the Supreme Court of India explain the Precautionary Principle in detail?
- Vellore Citizens’ Welfare Forum v Union of India
- A.P. Pollution Control Board v M.V. Nayudu
- Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v Union of India
- M.C. Mehta v Kamal Nath
View Solution
9.
A manufacturing company in the city of Surat named as ”X” has been discharging untreated industrial waste into a nearby river, violating the provisions of the Environment Protection Act, 1986 and the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974. This has resulted in severe pollution, making the river water unsafe for drinking and harming aquatic life. Local farmers and residents, who rely on the river for irrigation and daily needs, have started facing health issues and crop failures due to the contaminated water. Despite multiple complaints to the local pollution control board, no action has been taken against the company.
Based on the above problem, select the correct answer.
- It is the violation of Section 24 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.
- It is the violation of Section 40 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.
- It is not the violation of the provisions of the laws stated in the problem.
- It is the violation of Section 23 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.
View Solution
10.
Which is the leading case on environment?
- M.C. Mehta Vs Union of India
- Union of India Vs H.S. Dhillon
- Maneka Gandhi Vs Union of India
- None of the above
View Solution
11.
A manufacturing company in the city of Surat named as "X" has been discharging untreated industrial waste into a nearby river, violating the provisions of the Environment Protection Act, 1986 and the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974. This has resulted in severe pollution, making the river water unsafe for drinking and harming aquatic life. Local farmers and residents, who rely on the river for irrigation and daily needs, have started facing health issues and crop failures due to the contaminated water. Despite multiple complaints to the local pollution control board, no action has been taken against the company. Based on the above problem, select the correct answer:
- It is not the violation of the provisions of the laws stated in the problem.
- It is the violation of Section 23 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.
- It is the violation of Section 24 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.
- It is the violation of Section 40 of the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974.
View Solution
12.
According to Environmental Protection Act, 1986, 'environmental pollutant' means:
- any solid, liquid or gaseous substance present in such concentration as may be, or tend to be, helpful to the environment
- only gaseous substance present in such concentration as may be, or tend to be, injurious to environment
- any solid, liquid or gaseous substance present in such concentration as may be, or tend to be, injurious to environment
- any solid, liquid present in such concentration as may be, or tend to be, injurious to environment
View Solution
13.
In M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India, AIR 1987 SC1086 (Sri Ram Fertilizers case) the court held that:
- In escape of toxic gas the enterprise is strictly and absolutely liable to compensate all those who are affected by the accident and such liability is not subject to any of the exceptions which operate vis-a-vis the tortious principle of strict liability.
- In escape of a dangerous animal the owner is strictly and absolutely liable to compensate all those who are affected by the accident and such liability is not subject to any of the exceptions which operate vis-a-vis the tortious principle of strict liability.
- In escape of toxic gas the enterprise is strictly liable to compensate all those who are affected by the accident and such liability is subject to any of the exceptions which operate vis-a-vis the tortious principle of strict liability.
- A company or a corporation is not a state and hence not liable for leak of toxic gas affecting the health of the people
View Solution
14.
The convention of Climate Change was the outcome of
- The Stockholm Conference
- The Nairobi Conference
- The Vienna Conference
- The Rio De Janeiro Conference
View Solution
15.
Supreme court in a PIL known as Kamal Nath case evolved,
- Basic Future and Basic structure doctrine
- Public Trust doctrine
- Separation of power doctrine
- Public Interest doctrine
View Solution

View more AIBE Questions

SHARE ON FACEBOOK SHARE ON TWITTER

AIBE PYQs for Environmental Law with Solutions: Practice AIBE Previous Year Questions

AIBE PYQs for Environmental Law with Solutions

1.
Which of the following Acts is popularly known as Umbrella Legislation?

2.
M.C. Mehta Vs Union of India 1986 Shriram food and Fertilisers case relates to:

3.
Which of the following Acts is popularly known as Umbrella Legislation?

4.
The case Krishna Gopal V/s State of MP relates to

5.
Supreme Court in a PIL known as Kamal Nath case evolved,

6.
The case Krishna Gopal V/s State of MP relates to

7.
Which of the following is a landmark case on the public trust doctrine in Environmental Law?

8.
In which of the following case did the Supreme Court of India explain the Precautionary Principle in detail?

10.
Which is the leading case on environment?

12.
According to Environmental Protection Act, 1986, 'environmental pollutant' means:

13.
In M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India, AIR 1987 SC1086 (Sri Ram Fertilizers case) the court held that:

14.
The convention of Climate Change was the outcome of

15.
Supreme court in a PIL known as Kamal Nath case evolved,

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER

AIBE PYQs for Environmental Law with Solutions

1.Which of the following Acts is popularly known as Umbrella Legislation?

2.M.C. Mehta Vs Union of India 1986 Shriram food and Fertilisers case relates to:

3.Which of the following Acts is popularly known as Umbrella Legislation?

4.The case Krishna Gopal V/s State of MP relates to

5.Supreme Court in a PIL known as Kamal Nath case evolved,

6.The case Krishna Gopal V/s State of MP relates to

7.Which of the following is a landmark case on the public trust doctrine in Environmental Law?

8.In which of the following case did the Supreme Court of India explain the Precautionary Principle in detail?

10.Which is the leading case on environment?

12.According to Environmental Protection Act, 1986, 'environmental pollutant' means:

13.In M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India, AIR 1987 SC1086 (Sri Ram Fertilizers case) the court held that:

14.The convention of Climate Change was the outcome of

15.Supreme court in a PIL known as Kamal Nath case evolved,

Comments

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWS LETTER

1.
Which of the following Acts is popularly known as Umbrella Legislation?

2.
M.C. Mehta Vs Union of India 1986 Shriram food and Fertilisers case relates to:

3.
Which of the following Acts is popularly known as Umbrella Legislation?

4.
The case Krishna Gopal V/s State of MP relates to

5.
Supreme Court in a PIL known as Kamal Nath case evolved,

6.
The case Krishna Gopal V/s State of MP relates to

7.
Which of the following is a landmark case on the public trust doctrine in Environmental Law?

8.
In which of the following case did the Supreme Court of India explain the Precautionary Principle in detail?

10.
Which is the leading case on environment?

12.
According to Environmental Protection Act, 1986, 'environmental pollutant' means:

13.
In M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India, AIR 1987 SC1086 (Sri Ram Fertilizers case) the court held that:

14.
The convention of Climate Change was the outcome of

15.
Supreme court in a PIL known as Kamal Nath case evolved,