Memorable 4 years

College management was good and was concerned about the students. However their approach was a little out dated and they can look into some modern management techniques to impart better education

Gave TNPCEE and got a score of 59. I had a lot of interest in physics and had a good score in physics during my 12th std. That made me pick ECE which I felt had a lot to do with concepts of physics

It was detailed with ideal subjects for an ece student. However there could have been more focus on practical knowledge which would have helped in understanding concepts better

No internship was arranged by the institution. Some students managed to do it through their own contacts. All engineering colleges should take the responsibility of arranging internships

Placements were ok. TCs infy came initially and recruited in bulk with a salary of around 3 lakhs. Then There were few companies which picked some students for around 3 to 4 laks. Then there were a few bpos who recruited a few

First year fresher party, symposiums, annual cultural program called talentia were some of the events. Talentia had a good participation and it was fun being a part of it every year

Fee structure was feasible. It was on par with all the other engineering colleges. And there were a few scholarships that were availed. Also few student s were picked in sports quota

I know a few students who have availed sports quota. Their entire fee were taken care by the college and they only had to pay the University exam fee.

College gave good opportunities both in terms of competitions like debates, technology events, cultural s etc and sports. I was a part of the cricket team and have also taken part in several debates. I would get on duty for the same and was encouraged to take part in a lot of events

Hostel facilities were decent. It was maintained well and was clean. However food was average. The campus and hostel were very close and hence it's comfortable for the students.

Interaction with seniors at the campus was highly engaging and useful. There were various platforms through which we Interacted. However alumini activity is nil when it comes to my institution

Exams and labs were conducted too frequently and the way students were assesed in lab was biased. It was more about the rapport between student and faculty than how the student performed

Some of the faculties were good. However there should be more transparency from the faculty side in terms of how they assess a student. Also some of the faculties were not experienced enough