
What Students Say
Likes
- Teacheing methods, mentorship quality, faculty staff
- placement sevices , campus placements and support provided for career advancement
- quality of infrastructure, including campus amenities and learning facilities
Dislikes
- rigor of course curriculum was not good and flexible
- computer lab was not good. it was having small space
- canteen was not good . it was not clean . it was having small space.
Course Curriculum Overview
CERTAIN ASPECTS SUCH AS LONG DURATION COURSE CURRICULUM.THE FREQUENCY AND TIMING OF EXAMS ALONG WITH OUR PERSPECTIVE ON THEIR DIFFICULTY LEVEL WAS NOT UPTO THE MARK. TEACHING METODS SHOULD BE IMPROVED . COURSE CURRICULM SHOULD BE IMPROVED BY FACULTY MEMBERS AND STAFF.
Fees and Financial Aid
TUTION FEE INCREASE POLICY SHOULD COME INTO EFFECT . COST OF OUR EDUCATION SHUOLD BE LESS .SCHOLARSHIP GIVEN TO STUDENTS SHOULD BE MORE.CAMPUS EMPLOYMENT I HAVE UNDERTAKEN WAS GOOD BUT STIPEND GIVEN WAS LESS.
Campus Life
ANNUAL FESTIVAL WAS BEING HELD IN MAY EVERY YEAR NAMED WITH AZZARO. RANGE OF BOOKS WAS A LOT. FACILITIES PROVIDED IN THE CLASSROOM WAS GREAT. SPORTS AND EXTRA CURRICALAR ACTIVITIES WAS MUCH ENHANCED. BASKETBALL WAS AT TOP IN OUR COLLEGE CAMPUS.
Admission
ELIGIBILITY OF THE COURSE WAS +2 NON - MEDICAL. COMMON ENTRANCE TEST WAS THERE. EX-SERVICEMEN QUATA WAS GIVEN TO ME APPLICATION FEES WAS 350 RS /- APPLICATION DATES WAS IN SEPTEMBER 2005. ADMISSION PROCESS SHOULD BE ONLINE.
Faculty
THE FACULTY TO STUDENT RATIO WAS MORE AND IT HAS AN ADVERSE EFFECT ON OUR LEARNING EXPERIENCE. THE FACULTY CREDENTIALS AND THEIR APPROACH TO TEACHING MENTORSHIP WAS NOT GOOD. VEY LESS TIME WAS GIVEN TO INTERACT WITH TEACHERS AND APPROACABILITY.


.png?h=72&w=72&mode=stretch)












Comments